Tag Archive for: sexual harassment

Home | sexual harassment

Imagine a situation where an employee of yours is accused of serious sexual offences outside of work that doesn’t involve any work colleagues.

At first glance, a default approach might be to say that what happens outside of work is a private matter for the employee and so does not and should not affect their employment. But, it’s often more complicated than that.

In this sort of case, an employer may want to be mindful of three possible scenarios:

  1. Whether the employee’s behaviour outside of work affects, or may affect the organisation’s reputation.
  2. Whether the employee’s alleged behaviour impacts on whether their colleagues would want to work with them.
  3. If your organisation is subject to the Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) rules, then a third question might be about transferrable risk. While the considerations about this are beyond the scope of this piece, it is definitely still worth seeking advice about.

It’s worth remembering also, that the employment law test to arrive at a decision is on the balance of probabilities. This is a lower bar than the criminal test which is beyond reasonable doubt. This means that employers can and should arrive at their own conclusions and not have to feel that they need to wait for, or follow, the judgments and decisions in any criminal case. A word of warning here though: if the police are involved, you need to ensure that you don’t take any steps that the police might claim prejudices their own investigations, so it’s important to open a dialogue with them at an early stage.

This is a very complex area, which has become tricker with the arrival of social media and people commenting on a difficult situation. We recommend you should avoid any knee jerk reactions and promptly form a team who will deal with the process. If the incident has become widely known then let employees know who will be dealing with it and, for instance, designate a point of contact who will deal with media queries.

The standard advice regarding a disciplinary process also applies of ensuring a separation of roles, so someone should be given the task to investigate the matter, someone else (ideally more senior) should be given the task of hearing any disciplinary, should that be necessary; and then a third person (more senior still) should be identified as an appeal hearing manager.

It goes without saying that it is also sensible to take advice. Your organisation may well be facing this challenge for the first time whereas we have got experience in dealing with these matters.

For further advice and guidance on this matter or other HR related concerns, please contact Simon Martin in our team on 07384 813 076.

Home | sexual harassment

In our many investigations into misconduct and harassment allegations, a regular issue is when a colleague makes comments about another colleague’s appearance. 

Those remarks are often intended to be complimentary but can make the recipient of those remarks to feel ‘othered’.

This is a word that we are increasingly seeing in our interviews and it raises an interesting point.

Compliment or Criticism?

If a male manager comments regularly on how a female colleagues is dressed, their hair, or whether they have lost weight, that manager may well say that they intended it to be received as a positive thing.

However, if the manager doesn’t also comment on any male colleagues’ appearance then there is real risk that the female recipients of his comments could feel singled out, embarrassed or offended, particularly if the comments are made in front of a group of other people.

We recently did an investigation where something similar to the above happened. Whilst the comment in question was intended to be a compliment, in the mind of the recipient it merely served to highlight how something about her appearance was different to all of the other colleagues present.

ELM-Banner

What Are the Limitations of Behavioural Policies?

These examples show the limits of policies, as it is very difficult to draft a policy that covers every eventuality. Who would have thought for instance that you would need to specifically deal with looking at pornography whilst sat in the House of Commons?

If you do try to cover every possible eventuality in a policy then you will soon find that the policy will become very long and unwieldy and it will probably put a lot of employees off from reading it.  

Experience also says that as soon as you finish a policy like that and press print or post it on your intranet, then you’ll want to add to it – it will never stop growing.

What’s a Better Approach?

In a word: training. You should train your staff on the approach you want them to take, giving them examples of the sort of conduct mentioned above. You should then ask them to reflect on how it would make them feel if a colleague commented just on their appearance on a regular basis.

We tend to find that taking that approach and getting the delegates to consider the impact of certain behaviours can result in longer lasting changes in behaviours. Those changes will be much more effective than simply handing them a lengthy policy and asking them to read and digest it.

Narrow Quay HR delivers training on these types of issues. For further information about our training, please contact Simon Martin in our team on 07384 813 076 to find out more.