Tag Archive for: disciplinary

Home | disciplinary

Acas is consulting on a revised Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures, signalling a clear shift towards resolving workplace concerns earlier, more constructively and, where appropriate, informally. Formal disciplinary and grievance procedures are not going away. Serious concerns will still require a robust and fair formal process. However, the proposed Code encourages employers and employees to consider whether an issue can be resolved before it escalates into a formal dispute. The consultation closed on 23 September 2026, with Acas currently expecting the updated Code to come into effect in 2027, following the consultation and approval process.

What is changing?

1. A greater focus on early resolution

The biggest proposed change is an increased emphasis on dealing with concerns promptly and informally where appropriate. This could include a management conversation, clarifying expectations, providing support or training, making reasonable adjustments, or using mediation or a facilitated conversation. Importantly, an informal approach should not result in a formal warning or other formal disciplinary sanction.

2. Showing what has already been tried

Employers may be expected to explain what informal steps have already been taken before inviting an employee to a formal disciplinary meeting – or why an informal approach was not appropriate. Similarly, employees raising a formal grievance may be expected to explain what they have already done to try to resolve the issue and, where possible, what outcome they are seeking. This means organisations may need to become better at recording significant early interventions without turning every management conversation into a formal HR process.

3. More proportionate processes

The draft Code also reinforces that fact-finding and investigations should be objective, reasonable and proportionate. Once the facts are established, a formal disciplinary process may be appropriate, but it should not automatically be the only option. Depending on the circumstances, alternatives could include further support, training, mediation, a facilitated conversation or no further action. There is also clearer guidance that suspension should not be an automatic response. Where it is necessary, it should be justified, kept under review and as brief as possible.

What action can my organisation take now to prepare?

You do not need to wait for the new Code to take effect; now is a good time to review policies, processes and manager capability in readiness for the changes. Your focus should be on addressing concerns early where it is appropriate and safe to do so – but continue to use fair, robust formal procedures when the seriousness or nature of the issues requires them.

Review your policies – Make sure disciplinary and grievance policies allow for appropriate early and informal resolution, while being clear about when formal action is necessary.

Review your templates – Consider whether disciplinary letters should record what has already been tried to resolve an issue, or why informal action was not appropriate.

Build manager confidence – Managers will play a key role in this new approach. Ensure they have the skills to have difficult conversations, address concerns early and recognise when HR advice or formal action is required.

Keep appropriate records – ‘Informal’ should not mean ‘unrecorded.’ Consider how significant conversations and actions can be recorded proportionately.

Be clear about escalation – Some concerns will require formal action from the outset. Give managers clear guidance on when informal resolution is not appropriate.

Review suspension and mediation options – Ensure suspension is not treated as a default response and consider whether mediation or facilitated conversations could play a greater role in resolving suitable workplace disputes.

What does this mean for employers?

The direction of travel is clear: formal procedures remain important, but they should not always be the first destination. The proposed changes could help organisations resolve concerns more quickly, reduce the time and stress involved in formal processes and encourage more constructive working relationships.

There is also a legal dimension. Although the Acas Code is not legislation, employment tribunals take it into account in relevant cases, and an unreasonable failure to follow the Code can, in some circumstances, result in an award being adjusted by up to 25%.

If you need HR support with navigating these changes to Acas disciplinary and grievance procedures, please contact Helen Couchman at hcouchman@narrowquayhr.co.uk.

Home | disciplinary

A recent case illustrated why process and the associated details, can be critical when dealing with disciplinary issues. We look at the basics of a disciplinary process, the importance of following it and what could happen if you don’t!

The case of Miss M Crew and Miss J Mason v Three Milestone Education Ltd shines a spotlight on mistakes that can be made when managing a disciplinary and the importance of considering each case on its own merit. But first let’s take a look at the process.

Why Do You Need a Process for a Disciplinary?

Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, as part of the written statement of terms and conditions of employment, employers must provide employees with information on the disciplinary rules and the procedures for disciplinary decisions and appeals, or refer the employee to some other easily accessible document, such as a staff handbook, containing that information.

What About the Acas Code of Practice?

The Acas statutory Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures provides recommendations for dealing with disciplinary situations at work. Businesses may have their own processes that are more suited to their needs but the Acas statutory code is the minimum an employer must follow. Failure to follow the Acas Code may be taken into account by tribunals in deciding if a dismissal is fair. Similarly an unreasonable failure to follow the Acas Code may lead a tribunal to adjust the amount of compensation payable to the employee.

Any Other Benefits?

There are other sound reasons for having a documented process set out:

  • Provides clarity – confirmation to staff what behaviour is expected behaviour as well as what may be deemed unacceptable or inappropriate.
  • Clear structure – a mechanism to look at and resolve concerns constructively and encourage improvement. Sanctions are not the only outcomes and the process can identify what improvement is required of an employee and outline what support might be available to facilitate the required level of improvement.
  • Consistency and fairness – to ensure rigour in its application across the business and to endeavour to be in the best position to successfully defend any unfair dismissal claim.

What Should a Disciplinary Process Include?

Acas advise six steps in a disciplinary process:

  1. Assessing the options – whether the matter can or should initially be dealt with informally; whether it sits within another process such as a capability process.
  2. Once the process is invoked, undertaking a fair procedure – this includes acting swiftly to inform the employee of the concerns and the process to be followed; at the same time being mindful of the employee’s health and wellbeing. Identifying who will conduct the disciplinary hearing and who might be needed to hear an appeal if one is raised.
  3. Carrying out an investigation to establish the facts of the case. The investigation should be done by someone other than the disciplinary hearing manager to maintain fairness in the process.
  4. Conducting the disciplinary hearing to review the evidence from the investigation – giving the employee adequate notice so they have time to prepare and allowing them to be accompanied by a work colleague or trade union representative. Providing them with the opportunity to ask questions of the investigation.
  5. Following a fair disciplinary procedure, the employer should decide on the best outcome based on: the investigation findings, what is fair and reasonable and what their workplace has done in any similar cases before. The decision should be communicated to the employee in writing and also detail their right to appeal the decision.
  6. Follow up after the hearing as appropriate – this may include talking to those staff who were aware of the issue, to ensure confidentiality is maintained; updating HR records.

Do I Have to Follow All the Steps?

Yes. The requirement is for a fair process that allows all parties the ability to participate and to have access to all of the evidence. Failing to undertake one of those steps such as a separate investigation could undermine the findings of the disciplinary and lead to a possible tribunal claim. But it is also important to consider each case on its own merit and recognise where adaptation to the process may be required.

The case found that an employer who refused to allow an employee’s mother to attend as their companion, was a failure to make a reasonable adjustment. The tribunal found there were extenuating circumstances due to the employee’s disability and the requirement for additional support and that rejecting the request, created an intimidating environment.

The same case also highlighted the importance of independence in investigations. The case involved two employees and as a consequence two hearings and investigations. The employer decided to swap the roles of disciplinary hearing manager and investigation officer between the two employee hearings. The tribunal found that there were “chances of contamination in the investigation between the decision maker and investigator of both cases..” and that the approach taken ” was “outside the band of reasonable responses”.

What Are the Repercussions for Not Following the Process?

  • Risk of claims for unfair dismissal- inadequate procedures or failing to adhere to published processes could mean consideration is not given to specifics of a matter or the process is incomplete ahead of any disciplinary outcomes, resulting in higher risk of a claim being made.
  • Costs of defending a claim – outside of the possible awards that could be made, there are legal costs as well as the costs of management time to consider.
  • Reputational damage – externally to your employer brand which could impact negatively on relations with suppliers, customers and deter future employees. Similarly existing staff want to be reassured that that an organisation follows its own rules and won’t attempt to ‘fast track’ a process.

Employers can avoid these pitfalls by having documented disciplinary processes which are clearly communicated and accessible to all; ensure the processes are adhered to; and provide training to those hearing disciplinaries as well as those investigating them. Disciplinaries will be an inevitable part of the workplace environment, but employers who put these measures in place can reduce potential challenges and minimise risks of future claims.

For specialist HR support with any of these issues, please contact Sue Meehan Boyes in our team on 07384 468797.

Home | disciplinary

HR Consultants Caitlin Anniss and Sarah Martin discuss the support Narrow Quay HR can provide with disciplinary, grievance and appeal panels.

In this podcast, we discuss:

  • What is panel support?
  • Why might panel support be needed?
  • How we can support smaller businesses and larger organisations
  • How to decide if panel support would be beneficial to you 

How Can We Help?

Our specialist HR consultants can help your organisation by:

  • providing support with your day to day HR issues
  • auditing your HR policies and procedures to identify problems and suggest improvements
  • training for your staff
  • practical support with consultations and other HR projects
  • carrying out investigations into grievances, disciplinaries and other matters

Related Resources

If you require specialist HR support, please contact HR Consultant Caitlin Anniss on 07909 683938 or Sarah Martin on 07799 136091.